Re: {SUKLM} numbering scheme

[Maarten Vissers <mvissers@lucent.com>]

Eric,

I would like to propose to include the conversion scheme (formula and/or
table) in an appendix to GMPLS SONET/SDH extension document. Might be
helpful to readers of both G.707 and GMPLS. Otherwise I fear people keep
asking for it.

Regards,

Maarten

"Mannie, Eric" wrote:
> 
> Hello Manoj,
> 
> The label is the same of course.
> 
> The difference between SDH ITU-T G.707 1996 and SDH ITU-T G.707 2000 is a
> small bug coming from an old version. That should be removed by Lou. We
> should have only one SDH LSP encoding type value for SDH (same for SONET).
> 
> Lou: thanks to correct it.
> 
> For the conversion table, Maarten should still have it.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:28 PM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: {SUKLM} numbering scheme
> 
> Hi All,
>           I have a doubt regarding {SUKLM} numbering scheme. If I
> allocate one VC-4 signal from STM-64 link, will the {SUKLM} returned be
> different if LSP encoding type indicates SDH ITU-T G.707 1996 or SDH
> ITU-T G.707 2000 ?
> 
> Eric, on the ipo u and marteen once exchanged the conversion table for
> EDCBA and SU, If that table is correct, can u please tell me the
> formula from which u derived that table ?
> 
> Regards,
> manoj.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
begin:vcard 
n:Vissers;Maarten
tel;cell:+31 62 061 3945
tel;fax:+31 35 687 5976
tel;home:+31 35 526 5463
tel;work:+31 35 687 4270
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Optical Network Group;Lucent Technologies Nederland
version:2.1
email;internet:mvissers@lucent.com
title:Consulting Member of Technical Staff
adr;quoted-printable:;;Botterstraat 45=0D=0A=0D=0A;1271 XL Huizen;;;The Netherlands
fn:Maarten Vissers
end:vcard