Re: Doubt related to AdminStatus Object in GMPLS extentions to RSVP-TE

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

         Which "GMPLS drafts" are you referring to?

         --Tom

>        I have a doubt related to recently included AdminStatus object in 
> GMPLS drafts. It states two reasons for including this object. In Ist 
> case, the usage of this object by ingress node in non-refresh path 
> message or by transit or egress node in the notify message before 
> deleting the LSP is fine. Is this to supress the alarm generation by 
> optical nodes as  loss of light will propagate faster than the tear down 
> signalling messages (Path/Resv Tear?
>Can someone please explain me other reason to include this object in 
>PATH/RESV messages ? Is the use of this procedure only applicable prior to 
>LSP deletion ?
>
>Regards,
>manoj.
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>