Re: AW: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency

["manoj juneja" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>]

Hi Marteen,
            Agreed. VC-4-64c connection can be advertised as a FA and
can carry IP/ATM or ethernet traffic.

Now take the case where multiple LSPs are to be tunneled through the 
VC-4-64c connection (FA-LSP).
What about the label ? What type of label the tail end of VC-4-64c FA
-LSP i.e. node D will pass to the node A (i.e. head end of vc-4-64c FA
-LSP) ?
The LSP encoding and switching types are different for FA-LSP and the
LSP which is to be tunneled through the FA-LSP.

Regards,
manoj.


>From: Maarten Vissers <mvissers@lucent.com>
>To: "'manoj juneja'" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: Re: AW: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency
>Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:24:32 +0100
>
>Manoj,
>
>In transport terminology I would refer to this as a VC-4-64c trail 
>supporting an
>IP, ATM or Ethernet link.
>
>Regards,
>
>Maarten
>
>Heiles Juergen wrote:
> >
> > Manoj,
> >
> > this has nothing to do with forwarding adjacency. It is a restriction of 
>the transport plane. A VC-4 cannot be transported in a VC-4-64c. A VC-4-64c 
>supports IP, ATM, Ethernet as client signal, but not a VC-4 or 
>VC-3/2/12/11.
> > So you can have a VC-4-64c forwarding adjacency for IP, ATM or Ethernet 
>clients.
> >
> > Juergen
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2001 19:49
> > > An: juergen.heiles@icn.siemens.de; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > Betreff: Re: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Juergen,
> > >             Does this mean the forwarding adjacency concept is not
> > > applicable to concatenated signals/LSPs ? I hope forwarding
> > > adjacecny of
> > > virtual concatenated LSP should be allowed.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > manoj.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Juergen Heiles" <juergen.heiles@icn.siemens.de>
> > > >To: "'manoj juneja'" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>,
> > > <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> > > >Subject: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency
> > > >Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:19:03 +0100
> > > >
> > > >No, that is not possible as you cannot transport a VC-4 in a
> > > VC-4-64c. A
> > > >VC-4-64c only supports dat clients like ATM, IP, Ethernet.
> > > >
> > > >Juergen
> > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 23:44
> > > > > An: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > > > Betreff: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >          Can I tunnel a request for VC-4 LSP on VC-4-64c
> > > forwarding
> > > > > adjacency ? If yes, then what would be the {suklm} ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > manoj
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
><< mvissers.vcf >>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp