[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fwd: LSC Interface Doubt ...
Manoj,
that is exactly what the G.709 OCh does.
In addition to the optical signal it has specific overhead functionality (transported via the OSC) assigned.
Juergen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:24 PM
> To: mvissers@lucent.com
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: LSC Interface Doubt ...
>
>
> Hi Marteen,
> I refer to LSC interface as defined in GMPLS architecture
> document (i.e. interface which switch data based on the wavelength on
> which the data is received e.g. PXC or OXC which operate at the level
> of individual wavelength). I don't think it has any thing to do with
> Och (G.709).
>
> Regards,
> manoj.
>
>
> >From: Maarten Vissers <mvissers@lucent.com>
> >To: manoj juneja <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>
> >CC: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: Fwd: LSC Interface Doubt ...
> >Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 11:42:02 +0100
> >
> >Manoj,
> >
> >I assume you refer to G.709 OCh connections when you use the
> term "LSC
> >LSP". If
> >so, then a bi-directional OCh link connection will use the same OCh
> >tributary
> >slot in both directions; i.e. the same wavelenght is used
> for go and return
> >direction.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Maarten
> >
> >manoj juneja wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > If I need to establish a bi-directional LSC LSP then do I
> > > need to configure the remote end wavelengths on an LSC interface ?
> > > Is there any case where both the upstream and downstream
> labels of an
> > > bi-directional LSC LSP be same ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > manoj.
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> ><< mvissers.vcf >>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>