RE: CCAMP WG Last Call for Overlay document

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Kireeti, you write:
> In the previous Last Call, many folks replied to me personally.  It is
> in general preferable to reply to the list, in the interest of a more
> open and accountable IETF process.  If you do wish to reply privately,
> include at least one of the chairs and one of the ADs.

Could we also have a summary of what sort of comments you
got and from what sort of people? How many?

And may I urge those people to go public with their comments?
If you do not want to reveal your identity, then pls send them
to the ADs. We can promise confidentiality if you do ask for it.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
> Sent: zaterdag 26 april 2003 5:06
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: CCAMP WG Last Call for Overlay document
> 
> 
> 
> > On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> ...
> > As there were no comments suggesting
> > changes, and several private emails reinforcing the support 
> in the room,
> > Ron and I will forward this document to the IESG for an 
> IETF Last Call.
> 
> Okay, I have been corrected -- there were a few comments, mostly
> editorial in nature.  I suggest that the authors respin the doc, and
> when they do, we will have a one week Last Call.
> 
> In the previous Last Call, many folks replied to me personally.  It is
> in general preferable to reply to the list, in the interest of a more
> open and accountable IETF process.  If you do wish to reply privately,
> include at least one of the chairs and one of the ADs.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.
>