draft-day-cdnp-model-06.txt

[Fred Douglis <douglis@research.att.com>]

Looking at the "CDN Peering" I-D, I was wondering why it is still "CDN
Peering"...?  The content-peering.org cite links to this draft with a
more appropriate title (see
http://www.content-peering.org/ietf-cdi.html linking "A Model for
Content Internetworking" as
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-day-cdnp-model-06.txt).  

Is this one of these things where to keep it as an existing I-D (not
v00) it can't change title, and the idea of changing it (and the
things that refer to it) doesn't happen at the right time?  If so,
maybe now is the right time :)

Fred