RE: draft-day-cdnp-model-06.txt

["Mark Day" <markday@cisco.com>]

> Looking at the "CDN Peering" I-D, I was wondering why it is still "CDN
> Peering"...?  The content-peering.org cite links to this draft with a
> more appropriate title (see
> http://www.content-peering.org/ietf-cdi.html linking "A Model for
> Content Internetworking" as
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-day-cdnp-model-06.txt).
>
> Is this one of these things where to keep it as an existing I-D (not
> v00) it can't change title, and the idea of changing it (and the
> things that refer to it) doesn't happen at the right time?  If so,
> maybe now is the right time :)

I noticed the same thing when I was composing that last message. As I was
putting the titles along with the URLs and editors, I thought "oh, these are
quite good titles" until I got to the one where I'm editor, and thought,
"ugh, I'd better change that!"

I'll add it to the things to do in the next version.

--Mark