Re: [idn] Question for the Kanji & Hanja cognosentee

[liana.ydisg@juno.com]

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:09:33 -0400 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland
Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> writes:
> Ms. Ydisg,
> 
> Is there a typo right about ...
> 
> > Kanji is Han character in Japanese, while Hanji is 
> > Han character in Korean.  During historical transfering
> > in time or location differences to Japan and Korean, there are
> > some differences in forms between Hanji/SC and Hanji/SC,
>                                     ^     ^^     ^     ^^
>                                     here or here or here or here?
> 
> > but semanticly equivalent, as it is with TC/SC.  Unicode
> > combined all TC, SC, Hanji and Kanji into CJK character
> > table, and that is what we reference the set as CJK character
> > set.
> 
> OK. I've found what had surprised me, simplified (Japan) Chinese 
> characters.
> I'll assume that simplified (Korea) Chinese characters also exist. 
> Ditto for
> Vietnamese.
> 
> The Chinese I learned as a kid (TC) and the Chinese I learned in 
> Beijing (SC),
> clearly isn't all the TC or SC available to choose from, so now I 
> have a better
> understanding of the original comment.
> 
> Thanks for your assistance,
> Eric

Which "original comment" do you refer to?  I forget what I have 
said.

Liana Ye