Re: [idn] proposed i18n naming rules

["Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>]

Mark.Andrews@isc.org wrote:

> I'll put it another way.  Your plan requires that registries
> delegate both normalised and (potentially multiple)
> unnormalised forms of every delegation.  If they just
> delegate the normalised form the unnormalised request may
> not match against normalised delegation.

Why do illegal delegations have to be provided? Illegal queries do not
have to be matched. The onus is on the client to ensure they generate
valid lookups, not the server.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/