Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

> I think that it is *very* important that any "reactions" be posted to
the
> public list, especially if they are being used to form a decision as
to
> what a "rough consensus" is on these matters

Within IETF framework, there is nothing which say that "rough consensus"
are determined only by public lists discussion.

However, given the sensitivity of the work we doing, I certainly agree
with you that comments should (not must) be made as public, either
mailing list or face-to-face meeting, as possible. Private discussion
opinion will also be considered but we certainly place more value in
public discussion, either on the mailing list or face-to-face meeting.

I would prefer we drop this IETF process discussion (which is best deal
with in another group) and get back to our technical work.

-James Seng