Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document

[bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)]

Thanks for the clarification.

Regards,

Bill

At 12:58 AM 12/13/2001 +0800, James Seng/Personal wrote:
> > I think that it is *very* important that any "reactions" be posted to
>the
> > public list, especially if they are being used to form a decision as
>to
> > what a "rough consensus" is on these matters
>
>Within IETF framework, there is nothing which say that "rough consensus"
>are determined only by public lists discussion.
>
>However, given the sensitivity of the work we doing, I certainly agree
>with you that comments should (not must) be made as public, either
>mailing list or face-to-face meeting, as possible. Private discussion
>opinion will also be considered but we certainly place more value in
>public discussion, either on the mailing list or face-to-face meeting.
>
>I would prefer we drop this IETF process discussion (which is best deal
>with in another group) and get back to our technical work.
>
>-James Seng