[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Document Status?

To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>, James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 07:41:45 +0200
Cc: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.2.2.20020830211914.025be4c8@jay.songbird.com>
References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020830092156.042c6600@jay.songbird.com><"Yourmessage with ID"<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60336FDA3@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com><5.1.1.2.2.20020830092156.042c6600@jay.songbird.com><5.1.1.2.2.20020830110236.0260f0b0@jay.songbird.com><5.1.1.2.2.20020830211914.025be4c8@jay.songbird.com>

--On 2002-08-30 21.39 -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>> We have several emails discussion on the drafts.
> 
> These concerns were posted two months ago and no one, on that long list
> of folks working diligently on this specification, has publicly responded
> to the details of those concerns.  If I am incorrect please point to the
> place in the working group archive that shows otherwise.

Were those concernes yours? I can not see you starting a thread on this
mailing list since May 27, and that is three months ago.

Can you send me the Message-ID with the list of issues?

   paf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>

References:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- [idn] Document Status?
  - From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread