Re: [idn] Document Status?

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

--On 2002-08-31 14.02 +0200 Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> wrote:

> --On 2002-08-31 04.44 -0400 John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> wrote:
> 
>> I agree with you that this is a reasonable way to proceed.
>> However, I trust that the results of the rewriting process will
>> be circulated back to the WG and last-called again, and possibly
>> run back through an additional IETF Last Call.
> 
> I see this being of the decisions an AD _always_ have to make after
> getting comments, and a new document, back after issues have been rised.

s/being of the/being one of the/

  paf