Hi! Is it a bug or a feature that the ETHER-WIS MIB (RFC 3637) is named ETHER-WIS and not ETHER-WIS-MIB? draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02 suggests in Appendix C names of the form XXX-MIB. Sorry for my talent to ask questions too late. :-/ I found no easily searchable mailinglist archive to answer this question myself. -frank