[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t



Yes, but it would be kind of ironical to open RFC 2674 in order to accommodate a TC change, while drafts reflecting chartered items expired for two years remained un-finished. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Bell [mailto:Les_Bell@eur.3com.com]
> Sent: 22 December, 2003 6:19 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de; C. M. 
> Heard; mibs (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Please review and comment: 
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> There are already updates due to go in RFC 2674, to support 
> the IEEE 802.1t,
> IEEE 802.1u and IEEE 802.1v extensions.  These changes were 
> proposed in a draft
> (long since expired, and still requires some work) available at
> http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-bridge-ext-v2-01.txt
> 
> Les...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> on 22/12/2003 10:22:10
> 
> Sent by:  "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> 
> 
> To:   "Wijnen, Bert , j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de, "C. M. Heard"
>       <heard@pobox.com>
> cc:   "mibs  (Les Bell/GB/3Com)
> Subject:  RE: Please review and comment: 
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > And with my suggested approach above we can leave 2674 alone till
> > it needs to be opened for other reasons.
> >
> > Bert
> 
> Yes, please :-)
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>