[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
Yes, but it would be kind of ironical to open RFC 2674 in order to accommodate a TC change, while drafts reflecting chartered items expired for two years remained un-finished.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Bell [mailto:Les_Bell@eur.3com.com]
> Sent: 22 December, 2003 6:19 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de; C. M.
> Heard; mibs (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Please review and comment:
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
>
>
>
>
>
> There are already updates due to go in RFC 2674, to support
> the IEEE 802.1t,
> IEEE 802.1u and IEEE 802.1v extensions. These changes were
> proposed in a draft
> (long since expired, and still requires some work) available at
> http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-bridge-ext-v2-01.txt
>
> Les...
>
>
>
>
>
> "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> on 22/12/2003 10:22:10
>
> Sent by: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
>
>
> To: "Wijnen, Bert , j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de, "C. M. Heard"
> <heard@pobox.com>
> cc: "mibs (Les Bell/GB/3Com)
> Subject: RE: Please review and comment:
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
>
>
>
>
> > And with my suggested approach above we can leave 2674 alone till
> > it needs to be opened for other reasons.
> >
> > Bert
>
> Yes, please :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>