RE: Thoughts on draft-larsson-v6ops-mip-scenarios-00.txt

["Tony Larsson \(KI/EAB\)" <tony.larsson@ericsson.com>]

Hi Alexandru,

Thanks for your feedback!

[snip]

> 
> I have however only one little and precise particular 
> interest: a Mobile
> IPv6 Mobile Node (no Mobile IPv4) handing over between GPRS, UMTS and
> public WiFi NAT'ed networks.  This says almost everything about their
> type: their wireless is asymmetric, exclusively IPv4 and 
> behind NAT and
> the NAT's are very different from one another.  The new 
> protocol should
> be run on the MN itself and on one (not several) entity outside the
> access network.
> 
> Do you think this particular scenario is captured by the 
> draft?  Do you
> think line 4 of Table 1 matches my scenario?


Your scenario is captured by line #4 in table 1 (public v4 address), and line #12 in table 2 (private v4 address). Possibly also line #3 in table 1 and line #11 in table 2 if the application running on MN is v4.

/Tony


> 
> Finally, I tend to agree with a solution that does not bring in large
> modifciations to Mobile IPv6 nor Mobile IPv4.  I mean, there may exist
> nice interesting possiblities to use a v6 Home Address with 
> Mobile IPv4
> and vice-versa but I imagine modifying the code to support 
> that and, I'm
> a bit afraid.
> 
> Just some thoughts on the draft...
> 
> Alex
> 
>