RE: Requirements

["Robinson, Richard" <RRobin01@sprintspectrum.com>]

John,
I would be willing to participate in one of the ten minute rqmts
presentations but am not sure if it will be necessary - i'm open to the idea
and we will need to decide soon so i can make arrangements for London, etc  

next week i'm in Seoul for 3GPP2 - but will be in contact via email

still awaiting comment from one of my peer organizations

Richard Robinson
Sprint PCS
15405 College Boulevard
Lenexa, Kansas 66219
913.890.4242 (fax 4100)
MS - KSLNXZ0201
rrobin01@sprintspectrum.com


-----Original Message-----
From: John G. Waclawsky [mailto:jgw@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:30 PM
To: Robinson, Richard
Cc: more@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Requirements


Rich, If you make any changes or develop some interesting information,
charts
...etc., please let keep me in the loop. BTW, is someone from Sprint going
to
participate with the presentation in London? It would help.         Regards
John

"Robinson, Richard" wrote:

> it is just that the mobility of wireless subscribers as well as some
unique
> performance requirements/problems in the air interface may indeed bring
out
> special requirements - perhaps more so in the macro cell environment of
> wireless operators than in controlled micro/pico cell links
>
> some of these come through in Paul Reynolds draft - as wireless operators
> get engaged in these requirements some of the things that make wireless
> different may be highlighted - i'm reviewing the draft now
>
> Richard Robinson
> Sprint PCS
> 15405 College Boulevard
> Lenexa, Kansas 66219
> 913.890.4242 (fax 4100)
> MS - KSLNXZ0201
> rrobin01@sprintspectrum.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tim clifford [mailto:tjc@lacunanet.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:23 AM
> To: James Kempf; more@ops.ietf.org; jgw@cisco.com
> Subject: RE: Requirements
>
> which would seem to imply that we need to try to convince people at the
ietf
> (i think its a misnomer to say "convince the ietf") that we're talking
about
> more than a link layer, maybe the right term is mobility, or roaming
> services, or disadvantaged user devices, or large populations of always on
> subscribers  ;-)
>
> tc
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-more@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-more@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
> > Of James Kempf
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:47 AM
> > To: more@ops.ietf.org; jgw@cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: Requirements
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > There is no such catalog. In general, IETF has been resistent to
> > making wireless a special category. It is viewed as just another link
> > layer.
> >
> >               jak
> >
> > >Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:15:34 -0400
> > >From: "John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>
> > >To: more@ops.ietf.org
> > >Subject: Re: Requirements
> > >
> > >Does anyone know if the IETF does an cataloguing of activities
> > with regards to
> > wireless?
> > >For example is there a cross reference anywhere that describes wireless
> > activities going
> > >on in the IETF?  This information would probably be very uesful
> > for the mobile
> > >operators.    Regards  John
> > >
> > >
> >