Re: Requirements

["John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>]

Rich, I believe that we need your help. But, I am not tracking the speakers. I
don't know the current status. I think either Jim Kempf or Paul Reynolds is/are
doing the speaker scheduling and driving the agenda. They should be responding
to your question. Jim... Paul...   your thoughts????
Regards  John

"Robinson, Richard" wrote:

> John,
> I would be willing to participate in one of the ten minute rqmts
> presentations but am not sure if it will be necessary - i'm open to the idea
> and we will need to decide soon so i can make arrangements for London, etc
>
> next week i'm in Seoul for 3GPP2 - but will be in contact via email
>
> still awaiting comment from one of my peer organizations
>
> Richard Robinson
> Sprint PCS
> 15405 College Boulevard
> Lenexa, Kansas 66219
> 913.890.4242 (fax 4100)
> MS - KSLNXZ0201
> rrobin01@sprintspectrum.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G. Waclawsky [mailto:jgw@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:30 PM
> To: Robinson, Richard
> Cc: more@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Requirements
>
> Rich, If you make any changes or develop some interesting information,
> charts
> ...etc., please let keep me in the loop. BTW, is someone from Sprint going
> to
> participate with the presentation in London? It would help.         Regards
> John
>
> "Robinson, Richard" wrote:
>
> > it is just that the mobility of wireless subscribers as well as some
> unique
> > performance requirements/problems in the air interface may indeed bring
> out
> > special requirements - perhaps more so in the macro cell environment of
> > wireless operators than in controlled micro/pico cell links
> >
> > some of these come through in Paul Reynolds draft - as wireless operators
> > get engaged in these requirements some of the things that make wireless
> > different may be highlighted - i'm reviewing the draft now
> >
> > Richard Robinson
> > Sprint PCS
> > 15405 College Boulevard
> > Lenexa, Kansas 66219
> > 913.890.4242 (fax 4100)
> > MS - KSLNXZ0201
> > rrobin01@sprintspectrum.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tim clifford [mailto:tjc@lacunanet.net]
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:23 AM
> > To: James Kempf; more@ops.ietf.org; jgw@cisco.com
> > Subject: RE: Requirements
> >
> > which would seem to imply that we need to try to convince people at the
> ietf
> > (i think its a misnomer to say "convince the ietf") that we're talking
> about
> > more than a link layer, maybe the right term is mobility, or roaming
> > services, or disadvantaged user devices, or large populations of always on
> > subscribers  ;-)
> >
> > tc
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-more@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-more@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
> > > Of James Kempf
> > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:47 AM
> > > To: more@ops.ietf.org; jgw@cisco.com
> > > Subject: Re: Requirements
> > >
> > >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > There is no such catalog. In general, IETF has been resistent to
> > > making wireless a special category. It is viewed as just another link
> > > layer.
> > >
> > >               jak
> > >
> > > >Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:15:34 -0400
> > > >From: "John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>
> > > >To: more@ops.ietf.org
> > > >Subject: Re: Requirements
> > > >
> > > >Does anyone know if the IETF does an cataloguing of activities
> > > with regards to
> > > wireless?
> > > >For example is there a cross reference anywhere that describes wireless
> > > activities going
> > > >on in the IETF?  This information would probably be very uesful
> > > for the mobile
> > > >operators.    Regards  John
> > > >
> > > >
> > >