RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

OK, why don't you go ahaead and pubish

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cheenu Srinivasan [mailto:cheenu_srinivasan@hotmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 14:55
> To: bwijnen@lucent.com
> Cc: dperkins@dsperkins.com; tnadeau@cisco.com;
> arunv@force10networks.com; zinin@psg.com; swallow@cisco.com;
> loa.andersson@utfors.se; mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt
> 
> 
> >End of section 5.2.2 says:
> >
> >    The use of this indexing structure is further 
> illustrated using an
> >    example in Section 6.
> >
> >Probably better to say "example in Sections 6 and 7." ??
> 
> That's a cross reference that word failed to update for 
> whatever reason!
> Fixed to say "Section 7" (the one with the examples) now.
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/cheenu_s/draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-08.txt
> 
> >You have:
> >   mplsFTNMapRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
> >      SYNTAX              RowStatus {
> >                                active(1),
> >                                createAndGo(4),
> >                                destroy(6)
> >                             }
> >      MAX-ACCESS          read-create
> >      STATUS              current
> >
> >Maybe we were not clear. But the way to do this is to not sub-type
> >the RowStatus in the OBJECT-TYPE definition, but instead to do so
> >in the MODULE-COMPLIANCE... or so I think... but thinking again what
> >we want to achieve (namely that one can never get into a notInservice
> >or notReady state), maybe it is correct here.
> 
> I think we want to unconditionally restrict this RowStatus 
> object to these
> 3 values so that we don't have issues with people creating 
> other RowStatus
> values and then wondering what to do about the reindexing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Cheenu
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>