RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt

To: "'Cheenu Srinivasan'" <cheenu@alumni.princeton.edu>, <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:27:16 -0400
Cc: <dperkins@dsperkins.com>, <arunv@force10networks.com>, <zinin@psg.com>, <swallow@cisco.com>, <loa.andersson@utfors.se>, <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Law10-OE24XPn3XOjr400018320@hotmail.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems
Reply-to: <tnadeau@cisco.com>

- I've added a defval of nonVolatile for the storage type objects.

	Based on this, should we do this in the LSR and
TE MIBs too?

	--Tom

References:
- Re: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt
  - From: "Cheenu Srinivasan" <cheenu_srinivasan@hotmail.com>