RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I would do it wherever it makes sense.
And in many cases it indeed does make sense to add that.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 15:27
> To: 'Cheenu Srinivasan'; bwijnen@lucent.com
> Cc: dperkins@dsperkins.com; arunv@force10networks.com; zinin@psg.com;
> swallow@cisco.com; loa.andersson@utfors.se; mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: MIB Doctor review of: draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-07.txt
> 
> 
> 
> - I've added a defval of nonVolatile for the storage type objects.
> 
> 	Based on this, should we do this in the LSR and
> TE MIBs too?
> 
> 	--Tom
> 
> 
>