[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Proposed "Last Call" version of draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines [ Corrected, for the 2nd time ]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Dave Thaler wrote:
> The current guidelines doc says:
> 
> 4.6.1.7.  IpAddress
> 
>    The IpAddress type described in RFC 2578 Section 7.1.5 SHOULD NOT be
>    used in new MIB modules.  The InetAddress/InetAddressType textual
>    conventions [RFC3291bis] SHOULD be used instead.
> 
> Proposed additional sentence:
> 
>    The IpAddress type MAY be used in cases where the object is inherently
>    IPv4-specific and is either a scalar or appears in a table which is
>    only applicable to IPv4.

I can live with this, if there is consensus that it is OK.

Comments please.

Thanks,

Mike