RE: 484 octet limit (was: [802.1] MSTP MIB - mstpMapTable)

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>]

I recommend also keeping the newly accumulated guidelines on the O&M
website.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen
Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 5:35 AM
> To: Randy Presuhn
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: 484 octet limit (was: [802.1] MSTP MIB - mstpMapTable)
> 
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:42:46PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> 
> > No.  We'll always be accumulating wisdom about how to review MIBs.
> > Let's save this one, if we get agreement on it, for 
> inclusion in a future
> > update.  It has already taken too long to get this document 
> published.
> 
> I agree. And due to time it takes to publish, we might want to start
a
> new working document once the RFC is out so that we keep the changes
> in one place and evolve the document while using it. (Of course, the
> assumption here is that the editor who has done a great job to get
> this document put together is willing to continue doing a good job
> here.)
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
> 
>