RE: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Well, even for Informational I like to see a MIB doctor review.
We may not need to be as strict as stanadrads track maybe,
but we cannot allow them to violate SMI SYNTAX or basic good
MIB design principles.

But from the IETF Last Call, it seems they are going for PS (see
below), Are you volunteering?

Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 19:47
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: 'Virtual Router Management Information Base Using
SMIv2' to Proposed Standard 


The IESG has received a request from the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks WG 
to consider the following document:

- 'Virtual Router Management Information Base Using SMIv2 '
   <draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-21.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jcucchiara@mindspring.com [mailto:jcucchiara@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 02:42
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 
> This doc is supposed to be informational, would it still need 
> a MIB Dr.
> review?
> 
> The  L3 VPN working group decided to make VR and IPsec architectures
> informational (Please see email archives c. May 27, 2004) and 
> I believe that
> decision means that this MIB document is informational.  However,
> I don't see anything in this MIB document which clearly states that it
> is informational.
> 
> If it needs a review, even if it is informational,
> then I'd be happy to volunteer if no one else
> has the time.   I worked on VR based VPNs
> at Crescent Networks (in 2001-2002) and also
> worked with Joe Laria (one of the MIB co-authors)
> while at Crescent.  (The co-authors mention me in
> the Acknowledgement section because I commented on
> a very early version of the MIB).
> 
> Thanks,
>   -Joan
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> To: Mreview (E-mail) <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:12 PM
> Subject: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> 
> 
> > This doc is already in IETF Last Call, but has (as far as I know)
> > not yet had a MIB DOctor review. So I need a volunteer asap.
> >
> > Bert
> >
>