Re: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt

[<jcucchiara@mindspring.com>]

----- Original Message -----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>; Mreview (E-mail) <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt


> Well, even for Informational I like to see a MIB doctor review.
> We may not need to be as strict as stanadrads track maybe,
> but we cannot allow them to violate SMI SYNTAX or basic good
> MIB design principles.

okay.

>
> But from the IETF Last Call, it seems they are going for PS (see
> below), Are you volunteering?

Yes.

-Joan

>
> Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> The IESG
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 19:47
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org
> Subject: Last Call: 'Virtual Router Management Information Base Using
> SMIv2' to Proposed Standard
>
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks
WG
> to consider the following document:
>
> - 'Virtual Router Management Information Base Using SMIv2 '
>    <draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
> iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-21.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jcucchiara@mindspring.com [mailto:jcucchiara@mindspring.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 02:42
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> >
> >
> > Hi Bert,
> >
> > This doc is supposed to be informational, would it still need
> > a MIB Dr.
> > review?
> >
> > The  L3 VPN working group decided to make VR and IPsec architectures
> > informational (Please see email archives c. May 27, 2004) and
> > I believe that
> > decision means that this MIB document is informational.  However,
> > I don't see anything in this MIB document which clearly states that it
> > is informational.
> >
> > If it needs a review, even if it is informational,
> > then I'd be happy to volunteer if no one else
> > has the time.   I worked on VR based VPNs
> > at Crescent Networks (in 2001-2002) and also
> > worked with Joe Laria (one of the MIB co-authors)
> > while at Crescent.  (The co-authors mention me in
> > the Acknowledgement section because I commented on
> > a very early version of the MIB).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >   -Joan
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > To: Mreview (E-mail) <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:12 PM
> > Subject: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> >
> >
> > > This doc is already in IETF Last Call, but has (as far as I know)
> > > not yet had a MIB DOctor review. So I need a volunteer asap.
> > >
> > > Bert
> > >
> >
>