RE: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Thanks Joan, follow up email to you and l3vpn WG.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jcucchiara@mindspring.com [mailto:jcucchiara@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 19:01
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> To: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>; Mreview (E-mail) 
> <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:47 AM
> Subject: RE: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> 
> 
> > Well, even for Informational I like to see a MIB doctor review.
> > We may not need to be as strict as stanadrads track maybe,
> > but we cannot allow them to violate SMI SYNTAX or basic good
> > MIB design principles.
> 
> okay.
> 
> >
> > But from the IETF Last Call, it seems they are going for PS (see
> > below), Are you volunteering?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> -Joan
> 
> >
> > Bert
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> > The IESG
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 19:47
> > To: IETF-Announce
> > Cc: l3vpn@ietf.org
> > Subject: Last Call: 'Virtual Router Management Information 
> Base Using
> > SMIv2' to Proposed Standard
> >
> >
> > The IESG has received a request from the Layer 3 Virtual 
> Private Networks
> WG
> > to consider the following document:
> >
> > - 'Virtual Router Management Information Base Using SMIv2 '
> >    <draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> >
> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, 
> and solicits
> > final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
> > iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-21.
> >
> > The file can be obtained via
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jcucchiara@mindspring.com [mailto:jcucchiara@mindspring.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 02:42
> > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Bert,
> > >
> > > This doc is supposed to be informational, would it still need
> > > a MIB Dr.
> > > review?
> > >
> > > The  L3 VPN working group decided to make VR and IPsec 
> architectures
> > > informational (Please see email archives c. May 27, 2004) and
> > > I believe that
> > > decision means that this MIB document is informational.  However,
> > > I don't see anything in this MIB document which clearly 
> states that it
> > > is informational.
> > >
> > > If it needs a review, even if it is informational,
> > > then I'd be happy to volunteer if no one else
> > > has the time.   I worked on VR based VPNs
> > > at Crescent Networks (in 2001-2002) and also
> > > worked with Joe Laria (one of the MIB co-authors)
> > > while at Crescent.  (The co-authors mention me in
> > > the Acknowledgement section because I commented on
> > > a very early version of the MIB).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >   -Joan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > > To: Mreview (E-mail) <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:12 PM
> > > Subject: MIB Doctor review for: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vr-mib-04.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > > This doc is already in IETF Last Call, but has (as far 
> as I know)
> > > > not yet had a MIB DOctor review. So I need a volunteer asap.
> > > >
> > > > Bert
> > > >
> > >
> >
>