RE: [Gen-art] RE: REVIEW: draft-ietf-imss-fc-vf-mib-02.txt

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

I agree. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:40 PM
> To: MAP@MAP-NE.com; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: gramkumar@stanfordalumni.org; mreview@ops.ietf.org; 
> gen-art@ietf.org; kzm@cisco.com; scott.kipp@mcdata.com; 
> Black_David@emc.com
> Subject: RE: [Gen-art] RE: REVIEW: draft-ietf-imss-fc-vf-mib-02.txt
> 
> > I actually think the comments from David Harrington are 
> more critical.  
> > Mine takes just a simple decision, his comments are more 
> far-reaching 
> > thus harder to evaluate and entail a more substantial change if 
> > accepted.
> > 
> > 	-MAP
> > 
> > P.S.  This is on _today's_ agenda, right?
> 
> Apparently it is, but with the pair of Discusses against the 
> draft, it should not get approved this time.  Wearing my imss 
> WG chair hat, I think a revised draft is appropriate because 
> the "does this draft update RFC 4044?" issue looks like it's 
> going to involve some careful text crafting that I'd prefer 
> not to see done in haste.
> 
> Many thanks to the reviewers,
> --David (imss WG chair)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
>