Re: charter

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

fwiw I think Thomas's rewording is fine. It pushes the discussion
towards a v6 solution (this is the multi6 group after all) but doesn't
forbid ideas that are relevant to v4.

  Brian

Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
> Sean,
> 
> I don't want the group to focus on portability.  And I can accept Thomas's
> statement clearer heads will prevail.  If IPv4 is in the way, then let's
> move forward with solutions that use facilities within IPv6.  And until
> there are competing mechanisms we don't have to debate the point beyond
> this.
> 
> Maybe what I'm concerned about is word smithing.  And I'll back off as long
> as nobody hammers discussion later on mechanisms that are IP version
> independent.