Re: An idea: GxSE

["Paul Francis" <yoid2000@home.com>]

I'll do it.

PF


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon (Taz) Mischo" <taz@tazlore.com>
To: "Jim Bound" <seamus@bit-net.com>
Cc: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>; "Randy Bush"
<randy@psg.com>; <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: An idea: GxSE


> It was Paul's idea, so initially, I'd say it would be appropriate for him
> to.  I had some ideas I kind of tossed into the ring that I'd be happy to
> work on, but I must defer to Paul, as it's his brainchild :)
>
> -Taz
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jim Bound wrote:
>
> > could you or Paul take a stab at taking GxSE and extracting the reqs its
> > solves and we an put those in our reqs definition with other reqs.
> >
> > I do think it wise we have reqs and then solutions.
> >
> >
> > /jim
> > "Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jon (Taz) Mischo wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Randy, I suggested some very precise requirements text to take
account of the
> > > > fact that there is a lot of running and shipped code in existing
products that
> > > > is simply not going to get rewritten that quickly. Like it or not,
multi6
> > > > has to coexist with vanilla IPv6, and that generates its own set of
> > > > requirements.
> > >
> > > Brian, if we can make something like GxSE work with vanilla v6,
however,
> > > that should satisfy everyone.  Instead of clobbering the discussion, I
> > > think we should expand it.  There must be a happy medium.
> > >
> > > -Taz
> > >
> > > --
> > >         "Be liberal in what you accept,
> > >       and conservative in what you send.."
> > > --Jon Postel (1943-1998) RFC 1122, October 1989
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
>         "Be liberal in what you accept,
>       and conservative in what you send."
> --Jon Postel (1943-1998) RFC 1122, October 1989
>
>
>