[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Transport multihoming

To: Manuel Urueña Pascual <muruenya@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: Transport multihoming
From: Pekka Nikander <Pekka.Nikander@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:58:53 +0200
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org, isoto@it.uc3m.es
In-reply-to: <1036414318.2306.40.camel@requiem.it.uc3m.es>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1021026094313.3814A-100000@jazz-1.trumpet.com.au> <1036414318.2306.40.camel@requiem.it.uc3m.es>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021101

Manuel Urueña Pascual wrote:

Hi,

I've been working in a protocol that seems very close to your reasoning.
Not really a new approach but catching some good ideas from SCTP and
Mobile-IP to exchange dynamic/multiple addresses between end-hosts with
legacy transport protocols.

http://www.it.uc3m.es/muruenya/draft-muruenya-epcp-00.txt

I think it may be applicable to the multihoming problem, but I'm seeking
some feedback from the MH people.

Very interesting, IMHO.  Architecturally it looks fairly similar to HIP.
What would you consider to be the main differences?

--Pekka Nikander

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Transport multihoming
  - From: Manuel Urueña Pascual <muruenya@it.uc3m.es>

References:
- Re: Transport multihoming
  - From: Peter Tattam <peter@jazz-1.trumpet.com.au>
- Re: Transport multihoming
  - From: Manuel Urueña Pascual <muruenya@it.uc3m.es>

Prev by Date: Multihoming and IPv6 Multicast
Next by Date: Re: Transport multihoming
Previous by thread: Re: Transport multihoming
Next by thread: Re: Transport multihoming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread