Re: Router solutions

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

> > I think this is text is addressing several questions.
> >
> > I think it would be a good starting point for the WG item describing 
> > how multihoming is done today (but isn't there such a document 
> > already?).
> I made a first cut as such a document by ripping relevant text out of 
> the -01 requirements draft, but it was really rough and needs lots of 
> work. There were a few operators and researchers at the time who 
> offered to lend their experience to the draft to make it more useful, 
> but those offers of assistance didn't materalise at the time for one 
> reason or another (the rapid transition from room-to-think to 
> fear-of-being-laid-off at the time had more than a little to do with 
> it).
>
> I would be very happy to lend time to making that document useful, if 
> there is interest in doing so (and in contributing opinions and text 
> to it). I'm not sufficiently naive to think that consensus on such a 
> document would be a trivial thing to achieve, but I suspect it might 
> be easier to obtain than consensus on the requirements draft :)
I would suggest to incorporate the text from Iljitsch document if 
needed, and I would be willing to contribute as well.

BTW, what is the name of the document?

- kurtis -