Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

> Can we meet at:
>
> 	Transitions Planning BOF (6bonebof)
>
> 	Tuesday, March 18 at 1700-1800
>
> and state an opinion that 6bone address management responsibilities
> should be transferred to RIRs only after multihoming issues are solved?
>
> It seems to be that it is a (perhaps the only) rough consensus of 
> multi6.
>
> Or, does so many of us think v6 addresses may be widely assigned
> without multihoming issues solved?
I am not following your reasoning. I don't see why we should not move 
address management to where it belongs, and what that have to do with 
the multi6 issue?

- kurtis -