Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kurt;

> > 	Transitions Planning BOF (6bonebof)
> >
> > 	Tuesday, March 18 at 1700-1800
> >
> > and state an opinion that 6bone address management responsibilities
> > should be transferred to RIRs only after multihoming issues are solved?
> >
> > It seems to be that it is a (perhaps the only) rough consensus of 
> > multi6.
> >
> > Or, does so many of us think v6 addresses may be widely assigned
> > without multihoming issues solved?
> 
> I am not following your reasoning. I don't see why we should not move 
> address management to where it belongs, and what that have to do with 
> the multi6 issue?

Huh?

Are you saying it already belongs to where it belongs that there
should be no BoF?

							Masataka Ohta