Re: Move forward

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

> I think this is a very good approach and also what I tried to start
> doing with the road-map, except that I tried to group all solutions,
> and only noted the need to create a path forward. Do you think it would
> be useful to extend this document with this (or create a new one?). I
> don't mind changing the classes if we can consensus on a common
> grouping of approaches?

I think this way of classifying solutions can be very useful when trying
to come up with requirements or creating desing teams. However, in a
document that introduces someone to the subject this grouping may seem
arbitrary.