Re: Move forward

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

> > I think this is a very good approach and also what I tried to start
> > doing with the road-map, except that I tried to group all solutions,
> > and only noted the need to create a path forward. Do you think it 
> > would
> > be useful to extend this document with this (or create a new one?). I
> > don't mind changing the classes if we can consensus on a common
> > grouping of approaches?
> I think this way of classifying solutions can be very useful when 
> trying
> to come up with requirements or creating desing teams. However, in a
> document that introduces someone to the subject this grouping may seem
> arbitrary.
Agreed. But if you are referring to the road-map document, that was not 
meant to be an introduction to the subject.

- kurtis -