[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:53:23 +0859 ()
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0324100F@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>from "Bound, Jim" at "Mar 11, 2003 01:43:20 pm"

Jim;

> They are already being assigned and used folks.  Now not just by Asia
> and European ISPs, but U.S. ISPs and IXs too.  It has begun!!

I'm afraid you have been saying "It has begu!!" for these eight
years that we should assume that it won't begin for next eight
years.

Thank you.

> Taking what IPv6 is today and working it is the
> only course I think for time-to-market of this spec in or out of the

Taking what IPv6 has been for these eight years and?

							Masataka Ohta

References:
- RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Move forward
Next by Date: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Previous by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: RE: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread