Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Iljitsch;

> > The former problem is already too bad for people expecting multihomed
> > environment.
> 
> It's still better than singlehoming.

It is a variation of singlehoming.

> > Moreover, I'm afraid you underestimate the latter scalability problem.
> 
> > To move on, we must estimate the seriousness of lack of scalability
> > and, if it is not so bad, develop proper address assignment policy,
> > both of which take time, which disqualify your proposal.
> 
> It doesn't, as the evaluation can be performed while the solution is
> being used. As there is a built in "you have to renumber at some point"
> guarantee, whenever problems come up they can be fixed.

That kind of guarantee never works.

> But if you feel that geographic aggregation is superior to such a stop
> gap solution, I'm not going to argue.

I see no point discussing on stop gap solutions.

						Masataka Ohta