[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56

To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:40:16 +0100
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200303170959.SAA20532@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

I know the three policies fairly well. They are not similar but they
are fairly consistent.

How can you be sure they are consistent? What is the evaluation
criteria?

This is starting to be off-topic and I think we should move this to a more appropriate list like LIR-WG for RIPE.

I know the policies of the different regions fairly well.

- kurtis -

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

References:
- Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by Date: Start running
Previous by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Next by thread: Re: Again no multi6 at IETF#56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread