Re: Resolving geo discussions

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

On fredag, apr 11, 2003, at 23:07 Europe/Stockholm, Bound, Jim wrote:

> I would suggest this would put this debate as lets document it and 
> issue
> BCP and we move on to solve the problem at hand with architecture we 
> can
> review.  Maybe if we had matrix of each one proposed on slide we could
> share as idea?
>
> - We kill this discussion and turn it into work with deliverable.
> - We remove it to continue the architecture effort
> - And maybe we could produce a doc INFO/BCP that would be useful and 
> the
> IETF would think we have some clue as a team to produce something 
> others
> can use :--)
> - And we don't discuss it for 10 more years and just point to the RFC
> which will be useful to those who have children and come here to do 
> work
> someday :--)
Well, what you are saying is along the lines I tried to say in my other 
mail. Although I am not sure a BCP is the right way forward. I think we 
need something that more looks like the scenarios documents from v6ops.

- kurtis -