[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: updating GSE for the new millennium




Root name servers are also a service deserving of anycast
addresses.

Tony


|    Joe is absolutely on the right path.
|    
|    > contributed the following to RFC 1958:
|    >
|    >    3.11 Circular dependencies must be avoided.
|    >
|    >       For example, routing must not depend on look-ups 
|    in the Domain
|    >       Name System (DNS), since the updating of DNS 
|    servers depends on
|    >       successful routing
|    
|    And if you change this to:
|    
|    >       For example, core default free routing must not 
|    depend on look-ups in
|    >       the Domain Name System (DNS), since the updating 
|    of DNS servers depends
|    >       on successful defaul free routing
|    
|    Long ago there was a discussion about whether or not DNS 
|    servers were 
|    things that needed to be multihomed - the answer was that 
|    they were not.
|    
|    One does far better with multiple DNS servers on unique PA 
|    addresses.
|    DNS already deals with failover, etc...
|    
|    ]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.      
|         |  firewalls  [
|    ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, 
|    ON    |net architect[
|    ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca 
|    http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device |    driver[
|    ] 
|    panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel 
|    hacking, security guy"); [
|    
|    
|    
|    
|    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|    Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
|    Comment: Finger me for keys
|    
|    iQCVAwUBPrQ1noqHRg3pndX9AQHv3AQAxEjFFT5i5nuNorEJaexeB28KxtUn+XTw
|    Bky8s56cFGl8o6+oigxAQ0Z/EtcnUdJCrJsifxArQtwBzlSmqkR16sQcybdKlEjB
|    +/tNYDQvVO68CW2TNwHI37KzzFp+K+tNNSR6SQ/HMXXiqnix466+U4Ni1kvL99NV
|    w0LOMZx0/xI=
|    =6cUF
|    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|    
|