[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: updating GSE for the new millennium
Root name servers are also a service deserving of anycast
addresses.
Tony
| Joe is absolutely on the right path.
|
| > contributed the following to RFC 1958:
| >
| > 3.11 Circular dependencies must be avoided.
| >
| > For example, routing must not depend on look-ups
| in the Domain
| > Name System (DNS), since the updating of DNS
| servers depends on
| > successful routing
|
| And if you change this to:
|
| > For example, core default free routing must not
| depend on look-ups in
| > the Domain Name System (DNS), since the updating
| of DNS servers depends
| > on successful defaul free routing
|
| Long ago there was a discussion about whether or not DNS
| servers were
| things that needed to be multihomed - the answer was that
| they were not.
|
| One does far better with multiple DNS servers on unique PA
| addresses.
| DNS already deals with failover, etc...
|
| ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.
| | firewalls [
| ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa,
| ON |net architect[
| ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
| http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device | driver[
| ]
| panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel
| hacking, security guy"); [
|
|
|
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
| Comment: Finger me for keys
|
| iQCVAwUBPrQ1noqHRg3pndX9AQHv3AQAxEjFFT5i5nuNorEJaexeB28KxtUn+XTw
| Bky8s56cFGl8o6+oigxAQ0Z/EtcnUdJCrJsifxArQtwBzlSmqkR16sQcybdKlEjB
| +/tNYDQvVO68CW2TNwHI37KzzFp+K+tNNSR6SQ/HMXXiqnix466+U4Ni1kvL99NV
| w0LOMZx0/xI=
| =6cUF
| -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|