Re: WG last-call draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-05.txt

[Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>]

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 04:14 Canada/Eastern, Kurt Erik Lindqvist 
wrote:

> I would say no for this version. We might want to publish a new 
> version later on when we have a more clear picture.
Sections 3.1.4 and 3.2.4 kind of hint at this capability already. It's 
not very explicit, but since all the MUSTs and MUST NOTs have been 
stripped from the document, I don't think this should keep anybody 
awake at night.

So I also say "no for this version".


Joe