Re: WG last-call draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-05.txt

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

I would say no for this version. We might want to publish a new version 
later on when we have a more clear picture.

- kurtis -

On måndag, maj 5, 2003, at 20:22 Europe/Stockholm, David Conrad wrote:

> Just to be explicit:
>
> Christian raised an issue regarding the ability for 'smart hosts' to 
> be able to pick the return path.
>
> Should this be added to the list of goals?
>
> Rgds,
> -drc
>
> On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 06:51  AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > Quite right. Kurt last-called the obsolete draft.
> >
> > Could we restart the last call, on the basis of the -05 draft?
> > My answer on that is: ship it!
> >
> >   Brian
> >
> > Joe Abley wrote:
> > > On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 02:55 Canada/Eastern, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On måndag, maj 5, 2003, at 08:49 Europe/Stockholm, Brian E Carpenter
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hold it!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > I sent several editorial comments on April 16, that Joe stated he
> > > > > would
> > > > > include, and there was one substantive comment on the security
> > > > > considerations,
> > > > > where I think there was an agreed change.
> > > > Hmm. Joe?
> > > Those changes were applied, as far as I know. At least, I sent diffs 
> > > to
> > > the list at the time and received no feedback.
> > >
> > > > > So at the minimum there has to be an -05 version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, a last call that arrived 03:00 Monday and expires 12:00 
> > > > > Monday
> > > > > seems a little short ;-)
> > > > See other mail.
> > > -05 is the current draft.
> > >
> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-
> > > requirements-05.txt
> > >
> > > Joe