Re: WG last-call draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-05.txt

[David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>]

Just to be explicit:

Christian raised an issue regarding the ability for 'smart hosts' to be 
able to pick the return path.

Should this be added to the list of goals?

Rgds,
-drc

On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 06:51  AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Quite right. Kurt last-called the obsolete draft.
>
> Could we restart the last call, on the basis of the -05 draft?
> My answer on that is: ship it!
>
>   Brian
>
> Joe Abley wrote:
> > On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 02:55 Canada/Eastern, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On måndag, maj 5, 2003, at 08:49 Europe/Stockholm, Brian E Carpenter
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hold it!!!
> > > >
> > > > I sent several editorial comments on April 16, that Joe stated he
> > > > would
> > > > include, and there was one substantive comment on the security
> > > > considerations,
> > > > where I think there was an agreed change.
> > > Hmm. Joe?
> > Those changes were applied, as far as I know. At least, I sent diffs 
> > to
> > the list at the time and received no feedback.
> >
> > > > So at the minimum there has to be an -05 version.
> > > >
> > > > Also, a last call that arrived 03:00 Monday and expires 12:00 Monday
> > > > seems a little short ;-)
> > > See other mail.
> > -05 is the current draft.
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-
> > requirements-05.txt
> >
> > Joe