Re: WG last-call draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-05.txt

[David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>]

In reviewing the draft, I see that it is more generic than simply site 
multihoming.  Specifically, the last paragraph of 3.1.3 and section 
3.1.4 imply an ability to multihome down to a specific host (address 
range of 1) and applications (e.g., nntp servers) respectively.

I am not sure if or how this should be clarified -- perhaps it was just 
me jumping to the wrong conclusion.

Rgds,
-drc

On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 06:15  AM, Joe Abley wrote:

> On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 04:14 Canada/Eastern, Kurt Erik Lindqvist 
> wrote:
>
> > I would say no for this version. We might want to publish a new 
> > version later on when we have a more clear picture.
> Sections 3.1.4 and 3.2.4 kind of hint at this capability already. It's 
> not very explicit, but since all the MUSTs and MUST NOTs have been 
> stripped from the document, I don't think this should keep anybody 
> awake at night.
>
> So I also say "no for this version".
>
>
> Joe