Re: Agenda for Vienna

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On woensdag, mei 14, 2003, at 17:03 Europe/Amsterdam, Kurt Erik 
Lindqvist wrote:

> 2. The first session is early in the week, and have one topic. The 
> proposals that have then been made formally to the IETF will each get 
> around five minutes. Each presenter will be a member of a "panel". The 
> working-group and the other presenters are allowed to ask questions on 
> the proposals and try and better understand the proposals.
Who are the presenters? The authors?

> I also want to point out that the WG sessions are not there for a full 
> presentation of the proposals - You are supposed to read the drafts > :-)
I fully agree, however: it is likely that there will be a significant 
number of "new" people there to see what's shaking in multi6. It might 
be good to introduce every proposal so the entire audience at least 
knows the general gest of all proposals. Then they can read the draft 
before the second meeting if they're interested.

I think we need more than five minutes per proposal. Would ten be 
doable? Remember that not everyone is as brief as we were at the RIPE 
meeting in Amsterdam.  :-)

> I would personally not want to see several similar proposals being 
> presented,
The different takes on the whole locator/identifier thing are different 
enough to warrant talking about all that are fleshed out enough, I 
think.

Finally an organizational remark: if we allow everyone to have their 
own slides we lose half the allocated time with hooking up laptops. I 
suggest that everyone who presents submits some slides and someone 
makes sure all of them are projected around the right time. If Steve 
Kent can do it over the phone this should be easy...