Re: Agenda for Vienna

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kurt;

> 1. We schedule two sessions.

Why its not three 2H sessions? Have you tried?

> 2. The first session is early in the week, and have one topic. The 
> proposals that have then been made formally to the IETF will each get 
> around five minutes. Each presenter will be a member of a "panel".

Formally? OK. When can I see formal call for proposals?

Note that people, including chairs, insisting on a requirement draft
have been deprecating to discuss specific proposals.

> 3. The second session will be scheduled later in the week. This will 
> concentrate on the two main proposals that are currently being worked 
> on.

Hugh?

Two?

> Those being loc/id which seems to be the main one, and host based 
> solutions.

Host based loc/id is a single class of many solutions including LIN6.

> it is very clear that there is only two 
> real solutions being worked on at the moment.

Note that something being worked on is not better than something
completed.

Note also that repeating the same discussion against geo and GSE
again and again does not mean "work on".

							Masataka Ohta

PS

It's good that no time is wasted on a requirement draft.