Re: Agenda for Vienna

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

I believe we have a reasonable agenda proposal already from Kurt,
and that we need to meet. Certainly, whether to keep the WG alive
and if so how its charter needs to be updated should be a topic for
the end of the second session.

  Brian

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> On donderdag, mei 15, 2003, at 18:36 Europe/Amsterdam, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > this wg has yet to show good use of one session.
> 
> Randy, are you seriously suggesting that the chairs will be denied even
> a signle session in Vienna?
> 
> Obviously this wg isn't the best example of the IETF's prowess but we
> have been making progress towards useful work and consensus the past
> months, and I think it's important to capitalize on that face to face
> and create some momentum for further progress. Email and face to face
> interaction are simply not interchangable.
> 
> So what is it going to be: do you want to be part of the problem, or
> part of the solution?
> 
> Now if you have concrete suggestions for progress, by all means, let us
> know. (And yes, we know we have to send code.)