Re: Agenda for Vienna

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

I thought two multi6 sessions had been agreed some time ago for Vienna?

Is this no longer the case?  If so, why?

Tim

On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I believe we have a reasonable agenda proposal already from Kurt,
> and that we need to meet. Certainly, whether to keep the WG alive
> and if so how its charter needs to be updated should be a topic for
> the end of the second session.
> 
>   Brian
> 
> Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > 
> > On donderdag, mei 15, 2003, at 18:36 Europe/Amsterdam, Randy Bush wrote:
> > 
> > > this wg has yet to show good use of one session.
> > 
> > Randy, are you seriously suggesting that the chairs will be denied even
> > a signle session in Vienna?
> > 
> > Obviously this wg isn't the best example of the IETF's prowess but we
> > have been making progress towards useful work and consensus the past
> > months, and I think it's important to capitalize on that face to face
> > and create some momentum for further progress. Email and face to face
> > interaction are simply not interchangable.
> > 
> > So what is it going to be: do you want to be part of the problem, or
> > part of the solution?
> > 
> > Now if you have concrete suggestions for progress, by all means, let us
> > know. (And yes, we know we have to send code.)
> 
>