[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minutes / Notes



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Iljitsch" == Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> writes:
    Iljitsch> On the other hand, if we can do multihoming _without_
    Iljitsch> substantial changes but this means breaking TCP sessions
    Iljitsch> whenever a rehoming event occurs, that _could_ be a legitimate
    Iljitsch> tradeoff. 

  My opinion is that there are some additional provisos that will show up
that permit people who care to do something to make the session survive. One
of those will be SCTP, but there may be other things. As such, the "cost"
of that tradeoff may be reduceable to those willing to make minor
investments. 

    Iljitsch> change" is a red herring. The real question is how hard it is to 
    Iljitsch> implement a solution. The substantialness or fundamentalness of
    Iljitsch> the change has little bearing on the implementation
    Iljitsch> difficulty. The adoption of a round earth vs flat earth view is
    Iljitsch> very fundamental but it  
    Iljitsch> doesn't change the way you navigate a sailboat through the 
    Iljitsch> Mediterranean Sea very much.

  I agree.
  Any change to an end system is substantial. As such, a change is a change
is a change.

]      Out and about in Ottawa.    hmmm... beer.                |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys - custom hacks make this fully PGP2 compat

iQCVAwUBPxrW2YqHRg3pndX9AQEDqAP/bdMlVNWH/SvUWMOM2jn/wwZjF/z+NAbP
ijGQhaQ21W+O7RA5xZqPVE48muB4fO1SxLd6ABDF4uUVAuZsy1baYXxrionMxojj
wUGelzbkhHbdzPQeFt2WEp7sWx4bn+HQmczIsYIWgZGXg1Hx8qp+w3h82Zn8aTcs
Twi0C57xK3M=
=UmP4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----