RE: Fwd: Minutes / Notes

["marcelo bagnulo" <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>]

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org]En
> nombre de Masataka Ohta
> Enviado el: jueves, 24 de julio de 2003 13:38
> Para: marcelo bagnulo
> CC: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Asunto: Re: Fwd: Minutes / Notes
>
>
> Marcelo;
>
> > Hi Masataka,
> >
> > What about time shifting attacks?
> > I mean you can solve it with RR, but this implies periodical
> exchanges such
> > as MIPv6.
>
> Huh?

Please read MIPv6 spec and Pekka´s draft about ro security design

>
> > I do agree that DNS packet excahnge are susceptible to this
> kind of attacks,
>
> Huh?
>
> I'm afraid you don't correctly understand the requirement for weak and
> strong securities.
>

I was agreeing with you, so i am not sure what we are discussing now :-)

> > IMHO we should really consider this draft as a valuable input
> to the design
> > of the solution, since it describes many issues that have to be
> considered.
>
> Your problem is that our design team has already completed the design
> with all the issues resolved.
>

This is not a problem, it is great!

Could you please give us a pointer to the documents that explain the
security issues?

Regards, marcelo

> > Underestimating these issues will only delay the solution.
>
> No. We did not underestimate anything and the solution is already
> available that there is no delay.
>
> 							Masataka Ohta
>